 |
Opinion "Communicate,
Collaborate, Innovate" |
| Issue:
01/09 |
ECTA 2008 Regulatory Conference |
January 21,
2009 |
ATUG attended the European Competitive Telecommunications Association annual regulatory conference in November 2008.
A number of the topics discussed were of relevance to ATUG and our members and related to:
- Development of Australia’s National Broadband network
- Domestic mobile termination rates,
- International Mobile Roaming rates,
- Exemption from regulation
- Assessing competition
The agenda and speakers for the conference are at http://www.ectaportal.com/en/basic880.html
Workshop topics included:
- Infrastructure sharing
- MVNOs and Competition in the mobile market
- The Termination Conundrum
- IPTV, Access to Content and Net Neutrality
Conference Topics included:
Day 1
- Market analysis and geographic segmentation
- Next Generation Access Regulation – Fibre Access, Competition and Investment
- Universal Broadband and State Aid
Day 2
- Review of the EU Regulatory Framework
- Call termination and IP Interconnection
- Mobile Competitiveness and Data Roaming
ATUG has a full set of papers and presentations for use by members. The full set of papers can be purchased from ECTA for EUROs195 by contacting Sara Russell, srussell@ectaportal.com
Workshops Key Issues
Infrastructure Sharing Workshop
- Europe now seems to support regulated access to fibre networks at the deepest layer possible and at the wholesale service layer with prices reflecting a premium for the risks.
- Equivalent (not just open) access is a must - at every layer of the NGN.
- Approaches to risk sharing between operators - How much risk and who has the risk in fibre network roll-out?
- Regulators must take a very active role – early. Network topology decisions cannot be allowed to foreclose competition.
- Duct sharing regulation takes time – developing SLAs and pricing options. The Portugese Regulator took this decision in 2004 and it was fully operational in 2006.
- Cable is not seen as an effective competing network to fibre. Wireless helps mobility – it is not a substitute for fixed broadband services
Termination Workshop
- The fixed/mobile asymmetry provides a clear incentive for mobile operators to maintain MTRs
- A range of termination rate options are being considered for the future – include Bill and Keep; Peering
- The WIK (March 2008)study recommends reducing MTRs at wholesale dramatically over 3-5 years – possibly zero.
- Ofcom started a Mobile Sector Assessment in August 2008
- Pass through to consumer – Regulated Obligation on the incumbent; clause in wholesale contracts requiring reduction to be passed through to consumer retail prices
- International roaming market – can only be fixed by regulation.
- The GSMA says only mobile operators can access the Roaming Contracts (GSMA IP which they protect) which means MVNOs have not access to roaming services.
- Is there a Predatory pricing Problem - How can an operators own retail prices be lower than its wholesale roaming prices?
Conference Day 1 - Key Issues
- Task is to support European businesses achieve their goals to for productivity and efficiency – 35% of EU GDP is produced by the private sector
- Competition is not about multiple offers - it is about real choice.
- New generation networks do not need a new regulatory framework – they need risk sharing and a risk premium – co-funding with other players – could infrastructure sharing turn into market sharing and the exclusion of 3rd party access?
- What is efficient investment?
- New networks – must remain open, both fixed and mobile networks. EU Will not accept any walled garden arrangements by dominant players
- Ownership of ducts and fibre should not be allowed to support dominance/re-monopoly in broadband market. Regulatory decisions are easy – the hard work is making them work in practice eg ARCEP weekly meeting to ensure Duct Access decision will work
- EU will not allow existing level of competition to be damaged by transition to NGA.
- Financial crisis will not be used as an excuse to role back regulation in this sector
- Negotiation could be a tool eg internet and internet IP traffic eg peering agreements are an example of good practice – regulators could review for “fairness”
- It is doubtful that the infrastructure cost of NGN/NGA can be refinanced only by access fees only – paid for by content, a business model redefinition eg sharing between telco and content owners with State subsidy for rural areas
- ERG - working on IP Inter-Connect NGN Regulatory Principles
- Market Analyses - Geographic Segmentation; product segmentation (Spain); customer segmentation (INTUG); EU level markets
- Ofcom is using a new method of analysis in geographic segmentation decisions – HCC, homogenous competitive conditions (cf SSNIP)
- Ex-post approaches to telco sector competition – Competition Law has difficulty being effective in the telco/media market because of delay.
- Private enforcement action can be suitable eg Spanish Consumer Association has sued Telefonica
Conference Day 2 – Key Issues
- Regulation is needed as operators do not have the incentives to reach agreement on termination rates
- Bill and Keep will be a big discussion in 2009
- National Authorities cannot fix roaming rates
- Regulation of fibre networks will be explored in 2009 – cost, duplication, access,
- Functional separation has been included as an exceptional remedy in EU Package
- Consumer protection is an increasingly important issue: portability, transparency, complaint handling, contract provisions
- Next Generation Access policy discussions – investment conditions, risk sharing, risk premium, competition, technology neutrality of LLU
- Geographic segmentation of markets is being reviewed
- Symmetric obligations are being explored
- Problem of pass through of termination reductions
- A new world of scarcity in mobile internet capacity in an IP world – peering, bill and keep, pricing as a rationing tool
- Symmetry in termination – fixed operators invest more but earn less revenues from termination
- Termination rate benchmarking – regulated prices, balance sheet rule, cost analysis
- IP Interconnection position from ERG
- It is now clear that operators intend to keep the vertically integrated approach of the PSTN world – therefore will need regulation
- Operators seek regulatory holidays – but cling to regulated termination rates
- Data roaming charges – wholesale regulation – traffic steering is a big issue – drives consumer prices up even when wholesale prices are coming down
- Need retail safeguard cap of EURO 1 per MB (cf retail price regulation)
- KPN offers 25 cents per MB and this is still profitable
- Why do we have roaming and not peering? Mobile Internet interconnection eg Africa and Middle East
- SMS regulation will create a problem – as the international roaming rate may be lower now than domestic pricing
- Find a way to competition through innovation rather than through regulation – too low, too slow
- Transparency – a single data tariff exemplar from each operator so customers can easily compare offers.
Members interested in materials on particular topics should contact rosemary.sinclair@atug.org.au
** Details
for coming events will be forwarded via normal notice/event channels.
***This email has
been sent from: Patrick
Sinclair, Australian Telecommunications Users
Group, Suite 506, Level 5, 815 Pacific Hwy Chatswood
NSW 2067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
part of the services to its membership, ATUG e-mails members
of informed developments in the industry & forthcoming
events, which may be of interest to you.
If at any time you no longer wish to receive these e-mails, please Click
Here to unsubscribe.
|
|