If you cannot view this email please Click Here
For a printable version, please Click Here

Opinion "Communicate, Collaborate, Innovate"
Issue: 01/09
ECTA 2008 Regulatory Conference
January 21, 2009

ATUG attended the European Competitive Telecommunications Association annual regulatory conference in November 2008.

A number of the topics discussed were of relevance to ATUG and our members and related to:

  • Development of Australia’s National Broadband network
  • Domestic mobile termination rates,
  • International Mobile Roaming rates,
  • Exemption from regulation
  • Assessing competition

The agenda and speakers for the conference are at http://www.ectaportal.com/en/basic880.html

Workshop topics included:

  • Infrastructure sharing
  • MVNOs and Competition in the mobile market
  • The Termination Conundrum
  • IPTV, Access to Content and Net Neutrality

Conference Topics included:

Day 1

  • Market analysis and geographic segmentation
  • Next Generation Access Regulation – Fibre Access, Competition and Investment
  • Universal Broadband and State Aid

Day 2

  • Review of the EU Regulatory Framework
  • Call termination and IP Interconnection
  • Mobile Competitiveness and Data Roaming

ATUG has a full set of papers and presentations for use by members. The full set of papers can be purchased from ECTA for EUROs195 by contacting Sara Russell, srussell@ectaportal.com

Workshops Key Issues

Infrastructure Sharing Workshop

  • Europe now seems to support regulated access to fibre networks at the deepest layer possible and at the wholesale service layer with prices reflecting a premium for the risks.
  • Equivalent (not just open) access is a must - at every layer of the NGN.
  • Approaches to risk sharing between operators - How much risk and who has the risk in fibre network roll-out?
  • Regulators must take a very active role – early. Network topology decisions cannot be allowed to foreclose competition.
  • Duct sharing regulation takes time – developing SLAs and pricing options. The Portugese Regulator took this decision in 2004 and it was fully operational in 2006.
  • Cable is not seen as an effective competing network to fibre. Wireless helps mobility – it is not a substitute for fixed broadband services

Termination Workshop

  • The fixed/mobile asymmetry provides a clear incentive for mobile operators to maintain MTRs
  • A range of termination rate options are being considered for the future – include Bill and Keep; Peering
  • The WIK (March 2008)study recommends reducing MTRs at wholesale dramatically over 3-5 years – possibly zero.
  • Ofcom started a Mobile Sector Assessment in August 2008
  • Pass through to consumer – Regulated Obligation on the incumbent; clause in wholesale contracts requiring reduction to be passed through to consumer retail prices
  • International roaming market – can only be fixed by regulation.
  • The GSMA says only mobile operators can access the Roaming Contracts (GSMA IP which they protect) which means MVNOs have not access to roaming services.
  • Is there a Predatory pricing Problem - How can an operators own retail prices be lower than its wholesale roaming prices?

Conference Day 1 - Key Issues

  • Task is to support European businesses achieve their goals to for productivity and efficiency – 35% of EU GDP is produced by the private sector
  • Competition is not about multiple offers - it is about real choice.
  • New generation networks do not need a new regulatory framework – they need risk sharing and a risk premium – co-funding with other players – could infrastructure sharing turn into market sharing and the exclusion of 3rd party access?
  • What is efficient investment?
  • New networks – must remain open, both fixed and mobile networks. EU Will not accept any walled garden arrangements by dominant players
  • Ownership of ducts and fibre should not be allowed to support dominance/re-monopoly in broadband market. Regulatory decisions are easy – the hard work is making them work in practice eg ARCEP weekly meeting to ensure Duct Access decision will work
  • EU will not allow existing level of competition to be damaged by transition to NGA.
  • Financial crisis will not be used as an excuse to role back regulation in this sector
  • Negotiation could be a tool eg internet and internet IP traffic eg peering agreements are an example of good practice – regulators could review for “fairness”
  • It is doubtful that the infrastructure cost of NGN/NGA can be refinanced only by access fees only – paid for by content, a business model redefinition eg sharing between telco and content owners with State subsidy for rural areas
  • ERG - working on IP Inter-Connect NGN Regulatory Principles
  • Market Analyses - Geographic Segmentation; product segmentation (Spain); customer segmentation (INTUG); EU level markets
  • Ofcom is using a new method of analysis in geographic segmentation decisions – HCC, homogenous competitive conditions (cf SSNIP)
  • Ex-post approaches to telco sector competition – Competition Law has difficulty being effective in the telco/media market because of delay.
  • Private enforcement action can be suitable eg Spanish Consumer Association has sued Telefonica

 

Conference Day 2 – Key Issues

  • Regulation is needed as operators do not have the incentives to reach agreement on termination rates
  • Bill and Keep will be a big discussion in 2009
  • National Authorities cannot fix roaming rates
  • Regulation of fibre networks will be explored in 2009 – cost, duplication, access,
  • Functional separation has been included as an exceptional remedy in EU Package
  • Consumer protection is an increasingly important issue: portability, transparency, complaint handling, contract provisions
  • Next Generation Access policy discussions – investment conditions, risk sharing, risk premium, competition, technology neutrality of LLU
  • Geographic segmentation of markets is being reviewed
  • Symmetric obligations are being explored
  • Problem of pass through of termination reductions
  • A new world of scarcity in mobile internet capacity in an IP world – peering, bill and keep, pricing as a rationing tool
  • Symmetry in termination – fixed operators invest more but earn less revenues from termination
  • Termination rate benchmarking – regulated prices, balance sheet rule, cost analysis
  • IP Interconnection position from ERG
  • It is now clear that operators intend to keep the vertically integrated approach of the PSTN world – therefore will need regulation
  • Operators seek regulatory holidays – but cling to regulated termination rates
  • Data roaming charges – wholesale regulation – traffic steering is a big issue – drives consumer prices up even when wholesale prices are coming down
  • Need retail safeguard cap of EURO 1 per MB (cf retail price regulation)
  • KPN offers 25 cents per MB and this is still profitable
  • Why do we have roaming and not peering? Mobile Internet interconnection eg Africa and Middle East
  • SMS regulation will create a problem – as the international roaming rate may be lower now than domestic pricing
  • Find a way to competition through innovation rather than through regulation – too low, too slow
  • Transparency – a single data tariff exemplar from each operator so customers can easily compare offers.

Members interested in materials on particular topics should contact rosemary.sinclair@atug.org.au

** Details for coming events will be forwarded via normal notice/event channels.
***This email has been sent from: Patrick Sinclair, Australian Telecommunications Users Group, Suite 506, Level 5, 815 Pacific Hwy Chatswood NSW 2067
As part of the services to its membership, ATUG e-mails members of informed developments in the industry & forthcoming events, which may be of interest to you.
If at any time you no longer wish to receive these e-mails, please Click Here to unsubscribe.